Texas Takes on Mars: M&M Maker Faces Explosive Investigation Over Synthetic Food Dyes and Alleged Deception
In a bold move heating up the summer news cycle, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has fired a major shot across the bow of Mars, the world-renowned maker of M&M’s and Skittles candies. Paxton’s investigation isn’t just about what is in our kids’ Halloween baskets-it’s about growing national anxiety over artificial food dyes and the companies selling them to American families without full transparency. The probe targets Mars for what Paxton alleges is blatant “deceptive trade practices,” after the company failed to honor its public 2016 pledge to remove synthetic food dyes from all its products.
Despite announcing years ago that it would rid its iconic treats of controversial colorants, Mars has continued lacing its American candies with the very dyes consumers are increasingly desperate to avoid. The flashpoint? Foods like M&M’s and Skittles made and sold in Europe have the dyes removed, while, as critics charge, American children and parents are left in the dark. The outrage goes even deeper: as Reuters reported, Paxton is demanding Mars hand over internal documents to determine whether Mars’s public stance was nothing more than corporate smoke and mirrors. Texas, long a watchdog for national conservative causes, is once again leading the charge.
“It’s crystal clear: Mars knows how to make safer candy. They just won’t do it here,” asserted Texas AG spokesperson Karen Wright. “Texans deserve honesty-and safety-from corporations who profit off our families.”
The action in Texas comes hot on the heels of decisive moves from federal regulators. The FDA, under conservative and bipartisan pressure, revoked the authorization for notorious Red Food Dye No 3, citing disturbing findings that included tumors found in animal studies. Meanwhile, Trump-appointed Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is steering his ‘Make America Healthy Again’ campaign laser-focused on eliminating petroleum-based synthetic dyes from our nation’s food supply.
Mars Under Fire: Pledges vs. Practices
The saga stretches back to 2016, when Mars, responding to mounting consumer pressure, publicly promised to purge artificial colors across all product lines-much like its rivals including Hershey, Nestlé, and General Mills, who have already committed to similar action by 2028. Yet, nine years later, for millions of American families, nothing has changed. Shelves are still packed with M&M’s and Skittles colored using synthetic, petroleum-derived chemicals. The message from Mars? The company claims technical “challenges”-specifically, concerns about “color vibrancy” and “shelf stability”-mean that American candy just can’t go natural (for now), even while Europeans are happily munching on dye-free sweets. That rationale isn’t winning over parents, doctors, or consumer advocates.
While Mars argues that “consumer preferences differ” between American and European markets, critics say this is classic corporate doublespeak, designed to distract from financial motives and regulatory stonewalling. Paxton has publicly accused Mars of feeding Americans cheap chemicals, while giving European families the higher standard. Paxton’s office confirmed he has issued a civil investigative demand to compel Mars to release its internal communications and marketing documents. Was Mars knowingly misleading American consumers about the presence and risk of these dyes?
“They keep saying American parents “prefer” more chemicals. That’s not preference, that’s deception,” blasted Texas State Rep. David Huffman during a recent committee hearing. “If Mars can make candy safe in Munich, they can do it in Dallas.”
At the center of the controversy is FD&C Red No 3, a dye that the FDA banned after studies showed it caused cancer in laboratory animals. Parents are furious that this same ingredient still finds its way into candy and snacks sold in U.S. stores, even as Mars’s products in the EU are reformulated to comply with stricter standards.
Meanwhile, the health angle is impossible to ignore. Top medical experts, including HHS Sec. Kennedy, are raising serious red flags about the link between synthetic dyes and rising rates of attention deficit disorders, hypersensitivity, and even increased cancer risk. With the Trump administration’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ platform taking an aggressive line on ultraprocessed foods and artificial colorants nationwide, Mars’s resistance puts them directly in the crosshairs of Washington and Main Street alike.
The Red State Ripple: Conservative Leadership and Consumer Outrage
Texas has rapidly become ground zero in the fight for honest food labeling. Attorney General Paxton’s high-profile investigation comes at a time when Americans on both sides of the aisle are revisiting what’s in their pantries-and more importantly, what’s hidden in their kids’ lunch boxes. With trusted brands under the microscope, the culture war over food safety and parent choice is heating up.
What makes this case explosive is its timing. Fresh from his Supreme Court victories and hand-in-hand with the strength of post-reelection President Donald J. Trump, Paxton is leveraging Texas’s long tradition of pushing back against corporate overreach, Big Government, and out-of-touch elites. Texans are tired of having a different standard for their food than what’s on shelves in London or Paris. Paxton’s legal play is clear: If Mars was honest in 2016 about its dye-removal pledges, then where’s the proof? And if not, should American families have to pay the price?
“Mars needs to understand that in Texas, our families come first-and this means demanding transparency from every company, foreign and domestic,” said Paxton, addressing cheering supporters at a Houston town hall. “If they can clean up their act for Europe, they can do it for us.”
The pressure on Mars is mounting from all sides. Major food makers-including Kraft Heinz, J.M. Smucker, and PepsiCo-are falling in line, giving timelines to eliminate synthetic dyes by 2028. But Mars stands nearly alone in its foot-dragging, blaming “technical” and “preference” issues. Political insiders suggest that with the Texas probe underway, Mars may soon face not just regulatory scrutiny but a full-blown public relations crisis. The battle could ripple into the White House, fueling campaign talking points on food safety, families’ rights, and corporate integrity.
Looking Ahead: With Ken Paxton’s crusade energizing conservative voters and parents nationwide, the next chapter in the Mars saga is guaranteed to make headlines. Will Mars cave under mounting pressure and finally bring America’s candy standards up to par with Europe’s? Or will the sweet taste of profit keep artificial dyes in our food-at least until voters demand real change at the ballot box? Between state-level activism and a red-hot national campaign for food security, the stakes have never been higher in the heartland, or the heart of the American family.