‘Are we about to unleash another wave of ethics disasters with experimental COVID vaccines?’ These were the explosive words from Dr. Linda Kass at a recent medical ethics forum, and millions of rightfully concerned Americans are asking the same question. The medical establishment is once more parading a so-called public health breakthrough – CVXGA1, a new sprayable COVID-19 vaccine – that’s entering trials under a storm cloud of secrecy, questionable science, and damning conflict-of-interest allegations.

Unlike Trump’s bold pushback against Big Pharma over drug pricing, this latest vaccine push is a poster child for everything conservatives distrust: zero transparency, leftist global health agendas, and an utter disregard for American medical freedom.

“This isn’t just another jab – it’s a live, replicating GMO virus they want to spray into your kids’ noses.”

The so-called innovation? No needles here – CVXGA1 is inhaled right up the nose and, according to its own creators, uses a live, genetically modified parainfluenza virus vector. The idea, they say, is to sidestep the much-maligned mRNA technology. But instead of allaying safety fears, this new platform is now at the center of a firestorm.

Questions swirl over CVXGA1’s potential to “shed” viral particles into the environment, potentially exposing pregnant women, children, and the immunocompromised to genetic material against their consent. And as recent conservative voices on social media have warned: ‘They’re not done experimenting on us.’

Shedding isn’t the only flashpoint. The Phase 1 trial was riddled with red flags: only 72 recipients, no unvaccinated control group, a short study timeframe, researchers with conflicting financial ties to the vaccine maker CyanVac LLC, and virtually zero long-term safety tracking. According to published data, the open-label design alone could taint every safety outcome.

Live Virus, Live Risk – Are Americans the Guinea Pigs (Again)? What mainstream media won’t tell you is just how high the stakes are: CVXGA1 doesn’t just provoke controversy because of its live virus technology. Unlike older vaccines, it has the potential to replicate and escape into the world, via simple acts like sneezing or speaking.

At the root of all this is “viral shedding.” In plain English, once CVXGA1 enters your nasal passages, it can spread through the air – meaning even the unvaccinated, including infants, the elderly, and those with fragile health, could be exposed to GMOs against their will. According to Science Advances, researchers “found high levels of viral shedding in nasal swabs post-vaccination,” but never even bothered to study whether the virus could infect others.

At a Senate Health Oversight Hearing, whistleblowers torched the vaccine’s safety protocols. “Where’s the real data? Where’s informed consent?” bellowed Dr. Anita Granger, slamming the refusal to adequately study the risk of secondary exposure from vaccine recipients.

“We’re talking about shedding live GMO virus! When does medical experimentation against someone’s will become state-sanctioned abuse?” – Senate witness, July 2025

Critics warn CVXGA1 is a slippery slope – a dry run for future self-spreading gene therapies cooked up in partnership with global NGOs and leftwing pharma giants. If this vaccine is greenlighted, they argue, “No American is safe from forced exposure.”

As if the shedding risk isn’t alarming enough, the trial’s credibility collapses under scrutiny. The scientific design of CVXGA1’s study is riddled with flaws:

• No control group: Impossible to establish actual risks or compare outcomes. Even basic drug trials do better.
• Open-label approach: Both researchers and participants knew who got the vaccine – introducing bias at every turn.
• Conflict-of-interest: CyanVac, the developer, funded and directly employed researchers. The fox is guarding the henhouse.
• Zero long-term follow-up: Safety tracked for mere weeks – no data on months, years, or generational impact.
• Sample size of just 72: A statistical embarrassment for a product aimed at mass deployment.

And yet – the so-called experts are already pressing for a 10,000-person expansion trial.

America has seen this movie before: rushed COVID vaccines, incomplete safety data, and a government-media operation determined to silence dissent. Dr. Robert Sullivan, a respected anesthesiologist, sounded the alarm after his own health was destroyed by approved COVID vaccines. After receiving the shots, his lung capacity “plummeted by HALF in a week” and he was left with pulmonary hypertension for life, a serious heart-lung condition shared by many post-jab. His warning is urgent: these so-called new vaccine platforms are not risk-free.

Meanwhile, studies continue to pile up linking both COVID infection and vaccines to neurological disaster. The National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS) in India has uncovered a wave of post-vaccine cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome in COVID and post-vaccine patients, including “altered consciousness, seizures, and irreversible nerve injury.” Social media users are lighting up comment sections: “First the jabs, now this frankenvirus up our noses? Hard pass!”

COVID Public Health Policy: Spiraling From Bad to Worse? The past three years have seen unprecedented government overreach, medical censorship, and an unholy alliance between Big Pharma and public health bureaucrats. As Americans are still reckoning with the tragic fallout from rushed mRNA vaccine mandates, a new gene-based product is being quietly shepherded onto the market with even less oversight.

The official COVID narrative – that fast-tracked mRNA vaccines were unassailable and totally safe – has collapsed under the weight of lived experience and mounting scientific evidence. Whistleblowers, conservative medical voices, and international experts all agree: serious adverse events are real, and the American people deserve to know the truth.

Recent international studies underscore the dangers: A major Indian investigation identified rare but devastating neurological injuries – such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis – tied to the widely used Covishield vaccine. The largest global vaccine safety study to date, published this year, confirmed increased risks for neurological conditions across several COVID brands. And while the mainstream continues to blame these harms on “uncertain causation,” the patterns are too clear – and too consistent – to brush aside.

“COVID-19 survivors are more likely than ever to suffer dementia, psychosis, and psychiatric collapse – even years later.”

There’s another important wrinkle: a study from Northwestern Medicine even shows that vaccination beforehand does little to reduce the risk of devastating neurological symptoms in so-called long COVID patients. For millions, this has shattered the claim that vaccines would be a ticket back to health.

The emergence of CVXGA1 is not a lone event. It is the next logical step in a pipeline of inhalable, self-replicating gene therapies being promoted by shadowy networks of global health technocrats – and it’s coming for Americans who cherish consent, medical privacy, and real science.

With President Trump’s 2024 re-election, conservative lawmakers have an opportunity to demand rigorous oversight, accountability, and a stop to gene-based products that threaten informed consent and public safety. The fight for medical freedom is far from over, and patriots must remain vigilant as the next battlefront – inhalable, self-spreading gene technologies – emerges.